1. Status of this policy
This page sets the editorial standard the publication should adopt before production. It does not claim that unverified internal processes already occur. The correction contact, approval responsibilities and artificial-intelligence disclosure rule remain to be formally confirmed.
2. Editorial purpose
The Business Doer aims to turn business concepts into usable guidance: what a tool is, when it is useful, how to apply it, where it fails and what to do next. The intended principles are practical over theoretical, clear over complicated, actionable over inspirational, structured over superficial and useful over decorative.
3. Research and sources
Factual claims should be checked against suitable primary or authoritative sources. Sources should be attributed when a claim depends on a particular publication, dataset, law, framework origin or quotation. Opinion, inference, illustrative examples and measured facts should be distinguishable. No expert review, university affiliation or fact-checking team should be claimed unless it actually exists.
4. Originality and rights
Published material should be original or used under a documented permission, licence or legal exception. Quotations should be proportionate and attributed. Images, diagrams and datasets require a recorded source and rights basis. The current content model includes author, update date, image alt text and media metadata fields to support those controls.
5. Corrections and updates
Substantive errors should be assessed promptly, corrected transparently and reflected in the article’s updated date where appropriate. A working corrections channel must be published before launch: [LEGAL EMAIL ADDRESS PENDING]. The exact correction log and escalation process have not yet been confirmed.
6. Commercial transparency and independence
AdSense preparation exists but advertising is deliberately disabled. No sponsored-content or affiliate workflow was found. If introduced, paid relationships and affiliate links should be disclosed prominently where they affect the reader, never disguised as independent editorial judgement. Commercial involvement should not be allowed to silently alter conclusions.
7. Artificial intelligence
The project does not establish whether or how AI tools assist research, drafting, translation, illustration or editing. The publisher must document the real practice before claiming an editorial workflow. At minimum, accountable human review, primary-source verification, confidentiality safeguards, rights checks and correction responsibility should be recorded for each relevant use.
From 2 August 2026, Article 50 of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act applies transparency duties to certain AI-generated or manipulated content. Text published to inform the public on matters of public interest must be labelled where required unless it has undergone substantive human editorial review and a person assumes editorial responsibility. Deepfake image, audio or video requires clear disclosure subject to the Regulation’s specific exceptions. A cosmetic edit must not be portrayed as substantive review.
8. Limitations and accountability
Editorial content is not professional advice and cannot account for every business context. The named author and responsible publisher should be accountable for what is published. The responsible publisher is THE BUSINESS DOER LLC. Final editorial responsibility and the operating accountability process still require formal validation.